A comparison of different three-dimensional treatment planning techniques for localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer ?
Authors/Editors
Research Areas
- Health sciences (Areas of application)
- Health sciences (Disciplinary fields)
- Health sciences (Research subjects)
- Human and social sciences (Areas of application)
- Human and social sciences (Disciplinary fields)
- Human and social sciences (Research subjects)
- Natural science and engineering (Disciplinary fields)
- Natural science and engineering (Research subjects)
Publication Details
Output type: Journal article
Author list: Koswig S, Dinges S, Buchali A, Bohmer D, Salk J, Rosenthal P, Harder C, Schlenger L, Budach V
Publisher: Springer
Publication year: 1999
Journal: Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (0179-7158)
Volume number: 175
Issue number: 1
Start page: 10
End page: 16
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 0179-7158
eISSN: 1439-099X
Languages: German-Germany (DE-DE)
Unpaywall Data
Open access status: closed
Abstract
Conclusion: In the localized radiotherapy of prostate cancer in stage T1 or T2 the best protection for bladder and rectum was achieved by a 3D-planned conformal 6-field technique. If the seminal vesicles have been included in the target volume and in the case of large planning target volume other techniques should be taken for a better protection for organs at risk e. g. a 3D-planned 4-field technique box technique.
Keywords
dose volume histograms, prostate cancer, three-dimensional treatment planning
Documents
No matching items found.
