Examining Laughter Functionality in Jury Deliberations

Authors/Editors

Research Areas

No matching items found.

Publication Details

Output type: Journal article

Author list: Keyton J, Beck SJ

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Publication year: 2010

Journal: Small Group Research (1046-4964)

Volume number: 41

Issue number: 4

Start page: 386

End page: 407

Number of pages: 22

ISSN: 1046-4964

eISSN: 1552-8278

Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)

Unpaywall Data

Open access status: closed

Abstract

Despite a presumption that laughter and a death penalty decision seem incompatible, transcript data of jury deliberations from both the guilt-or-innocence and penalty phases of the State of Ohio v. Mark Ducic trial demonstrate that jurors do laugh. Working from the disparate literature on laughter, we problematized laughter from a group communication perspective and analyzed its functionality in jury interaction. The authors identified and analyzed 51 laughter sequences across 414 transcript pages. Three categories of laughter functions (i.e., relational, processual, and informational) were identified; these categories were further detailed by 6, 10, and 10 subfunctions, respectively. Based on these findings, the authors revised their definition of laughter to incorporate its multifunctionality as vocalic and public emotional displays that (a) can be read as positive, negative, or ambiguous and (b) question, control, and regulate relationships, procedures, and information in the group. That laughter can be read in so many ways suggests that one role of laughter may be to create ambiguity to allow the group a chance to figure out what to do next.

Keywords

group interaction, jury, laughter, message function

Documents