Wisdom-related knowledge in a life review task: age differences and the role of professional specialization.


Authors / Editors


Research Areas

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Output typeJournal article

Author listStaudinger, Smith, Baltes

PublisherAmerican Psychological Association

Publication year1992

JournalPsychology and Aging (0882-7974)

Volume number7

Issue number2

Start page271

End page81

Number of pages-189

ISSN0882-7974

eISSN1939-1498

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


Unpaywall Data

Open access statusclosed


Abstract

The study adopts life review as an avenue to access wisdom-related knowledge and examines the contribution of age and type of professional specialization to individual differences in wisdom-related knowledge. Women from 2 age groups/cohorts (young, M = 32 years; old, M = 71 years) and different professional specializations (human services vs. nonhuman services) were asked to think aloud about the life review of a fictitious woman who was either young or old. Verbal protocols were scored on 5 wisdom-related criteria: factual and procedural knowledge about life, life-span contextualism, relativism of values, recognition, and management of uncertainty. Three major findings emerged. First, human-services professionals outperformed the control group. Second, old adults performed as well as young adults. Third, for older adults wisdom-related performance was enhanced by the match between their own age and the age of the fictitious character.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Documents

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2025-01-07 at 00:26