Comparing respiratory gated with delayed scans in the detection of colorectal carcinoma hepatic and pulmonary metastases with 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Authors / Editors
Research Areas
Publication Details
Output type: Journal article
Author list: Hassler, Hubele, Constantinesco, Goetz
Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication year: 2014
Journal: Clinical Nuclear Medicine (0363-9762)
Volume number: 39
Issue number: 1
Start page: e7
End page: e13
ISSN: 0363-9762
eISSN: 1536-0229
Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)
Unpaywall Data
Open access status: closed
Abstract
PURPOSE\nIn patients experiencing colorectal carcinoma, exhaustive analysis of indicates extent of hepatic and pulmonary surgery that prolongs survival of patients.\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nTo localize metastasis, we compared 2 F-FDG PET-CT imaging protocols, early respiratory gated scan, and delayed scan, to standard PET imaging procedure. SUVmax and lesion-to-healthy tissue ratio were measured in 60 pulmonary and 21 hepatic lesions by each of the 2 imaging protocols.\nRESULTS\nIn the liver, metastatic lesion-to-healthy tissue ratios significantly increased on delayed scans as compared with early scans (P < 0.001). Better ratios could not be obtained when using respiratory gated scans, whereas more lesions were detected on delayed scans. In the lungs, metastatic lesion- to-healthy tissue ratio increased significantly on delayed scans for largest lesions (P < 0.001). Ratios were not better when exploring smallest metastatic lesions or when using respiratory gated scans. Factors interfering with F-FDG PET-CT sensitivity are discussed, such as respiratory motion and high FDG physiological uptake in healthy liver parenchyma.\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur studies indicate that routine acquisitions should use delayed hepatic scans for all patients referred for evaluation, recurrence check, or monitoring of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Delayed pulmonary scans are useful for the largest metastatic lesions and should be used in addition to early scan. In our experience, respiratory gated scans seem to be less convenient because of a low sensitivity in detection, as compared with the delayed technique; in addition, this technique is currently complicated by some technical issues, although these might be overcome with new gated protocols.
Keywords
No matching items found.
Documents
No matching items found.
