Rhinovirus infection and healthcare utilisation in prematurely born infants.


Authors / Editors


Research Areas

No matching items found.


Publication Details

Output typeJournal article

Author listDrysdale SB, Alcazar-Paris M, Wilson T, Smith M, Zuckerman M, Broughton S, Rafferty GF, Peacock JL, Johnston SL, Greenough A

PublisherEuropean Respiratory Society

Publication year2013

JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal (0903-1936)

Volume number42

Issue number4

Number of pages8

ISSN0903-1936

eISSN1399-3003

LanguagesEnglish-Great Britain (EN-GB)


Unpaywall Data

Open access statusbronze

Full text URLhttps://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/42/4/1029.full.pdf


Abstract

Do rhinovirus lower respiratory tract infections (RV) LRTIs in prematurely born infants increase health related cost of care during infancy? Patients and methods: 153 infants born <36 weeks of gestation were prospectively followed to one year. Cost of care was calculated from the NHS reference costing scheme and health care utilisation determined by examining hospital/general practitioner records.Twenty infants developed RV LRTIs (RV group), 17 RSV LRTIs (RSV group), 12 both RV and RSV LRTIs (RV/RSV group), 74 had no LRTI (no LRTI group). Compared to the no LRTI group, the RV/RSV LRTI group had the greatest increase in adjusted mean cost (difference=£5769), followed by the RV LRTI group (difference=£278), then the RSV LRTI group (difference=£172), p=0.045. The RV group had more out-patient (p<0.05) and respiratory related general practitioner (p<0.05) attendances and more wheezed at follow up (p<0.001) than the no LRTI group and more respiratory related out-patient attendances than the RSV LRTI group (p<0.05). Answer to the question: RV LRTIs were associated with increased health related cost of care during infancy; our results suggest that the RV compared to the RSV group suffered greater chronic respiratory morbidity.


Keywords

No matching items found.


Documents

No matching items found.


Last updated on 2025-01-07 at 00:04